Wednesday 31 December 2003
Dangerous dog
Will someone put the bitch down at the earliest opportunity? There is a limit to what is acceptable in today’s society. The thing is an ugly brute too.
Previous post: Content drought | Main page | Next post: Happy New Year
One Response to “Dangerous dog”
- NAVIGATION:
- current blogging
- graybiography
- RSS 2.0
- comments RSS 2.0
- support this site
- Amazon wishlist
- Amazon wishlist RSS
- DEL.ICIO.US:
- CONTACT:
- AIM: ghspencer
- send e-mail
- CURRENT MOOD:
- short of time so rarely updating the sidebar!
- how are you?
- updated at 14/5/07 13:33
- CURRENT READING:
- Freakonomics by Steven D Levitt
- Wallpaper* - 100th issue
- RECENTLY ACQUIRED CDs
- Foley Room - Amon Tobin
- CLASSIC CDs REVISITED
- Soul Weekender - various artists
- Far Away Trains Passing By - Ulrich Schnauss
- REGULAR READING:
- Getting On
- Gordon McLean
- LMG
- me(ish)
- Parallax View
- Scaryduck
- recently updated UK blogs
- CATEGORIES:
- amusing links
- art and architecture
- books and literature
- cats
- Chichester
- current affairs
- del.icio.us
- East Sussex
- food and drink
- friends
- general
- grayblog.co.uk
- home and garden
- married life
- miscellaneous
- music and radio
- Netherlands
- old blogging
- personal
- photography
- science
- sporting life
- the blogosphere
- Tom
- travel
- very old blogging
- work
- ARCHIVES:
- November 2008 (7)
- October 2008 (14)
- September 2008 (14)
- August 2008 (7)
- July 2008 (16)
- June 2008 (9)
- May 2008 (12)
- April 2008 (12)
- March 2008 (15)
- February 2008 (18)
- January 2008 (14)
- December 2007 (11)
- November 2007 (8)
- October 2007 (8)
- September 2007 (10)
- August 2007 (4)
- July 2007 (18)
- June 2007 (6)
- May 2007 (10)
- April 2007 (12)
- March 2007 (24)
- February 2007 (18)
- January 2007 (7)
- December 2006 (15)
- November 2006 (13)
- October 2006 (15)
- September 2006 (14)
- August 2006 (14)
- July 2006 (13)
- June 2006 (8)
- May 2006 (18)
- April 2006 (15)
- March 2006 (26)
- February 2006 (14)
- January 2006 (21)
- December 2005 (28)
- November 2005 (19)
- October 2005 (24)
- September 2005 (30)
- August 2005 (39)
- July 2005 (33)
- June 2005 (18)
- May 2005 (29)
- April 2005 (72)
- March 2005 (64)
- February 2005 (64)
- January 2005 (87)
- December 2004 (61)
- November 2004 (66)
- October 2004 (29)
- September 2004 (67)
- August 2004 (45)
- July 2004 (52)
- June 2004 (40)
- May 2004 (50)
- April 2004 (52)
- March 2004 (63)
- February 2004 (55)
- January 2004 (61)
- December 2003 (55)
- November 2003 (39)
- October 2003 (38)
- September 2003 (135)
- August 2003 (151)
- July 2003 (134)
- June 2003 (135)
- May 2003 (129)
- April 2003 (135)
- March 2003 (157)
- February 2003 (128)
- January 2003 (98)
- December 2002 (114)
- November 2002 (128)
- October 2002 (172)
- September 2002 (132)
- August 2002 (134)
- July 2002 (151)
- June 2002 (108)
- May 2002 (75)
- April 2002 (127)
- March 2002 (113)
- February 2002 (132)
- January 2002 (141)
- December 2001 (110)
- November 2001 (147)
- October 2001 (170)
- September 2001 (157)
- August 2001 (128)
- July 2001 (137)
- June 2001 (117)
- May 2001 (114)
- April 2001 (198)
- March 2001 (146)
- February 2001 (115)
- January 2001 (92)
- December 2000 (96)
- November 2000 (117)
- October 2000 (42)
- September 2000 (13)
0.339 || Powered by WordPress
December 31st, 2003 at 10:30 pm
12 hours since you posted and no-one has added the comment “yes, and the dogs aren’t that pretty either!”
Considering that the Royal Family have been trying to “modernise” and handle their public personas in a more caring and down-to-earth way this series of events is a p.r. nightmare. I can’t see them being in anything but a lose/lose situation.